Feeds:
Posts
Comments

“What came first the chicken or the egg?”

This question has been posed to most of us since grade school and despite advanced academic degrees, no one has been able to answer it.

In the world of writing, we having a question that will make the chicken and the egg look like a brunch special. What comes first plot or character? I would dare to say plot and character are birthed simultaneously, yet one forms the other.

For example, an author is walking through the mall and sees a sixteen year old Lolita flirting with a young mall cop after she stole some earrings from Sears. In the womb of the author’s mind, the premise for a story is conceived.  A young, new teacher must defend himself after allegations he had an affair with the school  slut.

At the moment the Lifetime movie of the Week idea popped into the author’s head, plot and character were born.

Plot: A teacher must defend his innocence.

Character: Teacher, Student

At this point, what does the author do? He rushes over to Chick Fil-A, buys a lemonade, sits in a quiet spot, takes out his notepad and begins to write…but what?

He writes down the basic premise. At this point, anything he had to do at the mall is eclipsed by the story gestating in his mind. He rushes home to get to his word processor.

It is at this point that he has a choice. He has been taught in writing courses and various books on writing two conflicting ideas on how to tackle plot and character.

Idea I: Know your plot and your characters will grow from there.

The author begins to write the story. It is the young, new teacher’s first day. He is excited about instilling the minds of his students with the works of literature. He begins his class and in comes a tardy student, Kelly McDonald. He has heard of her from the students. She’s the head cheerleader and school slut. Kelly sits in a desk in the front row, says her locker was stuck which is why she was late, and finally crosses her legs pretending to be a high school Catherine Tramell.

Eight chapters in, the teacher and Kelly have had several inappropriate sexual encounters. Many scenes are conflict-less because the author doesn’t know where the characters come from, but he’s growing with them. He’s discovering them, like a miner in the Old West searching for gold.

As he writes, he creates subplots involving Kelly’s older sister named Rachel. The author mentions in a bit of exposition that the teacher bedded Rachel when they attended the high school years ago. Also, Rachel and Kelly have intense sibling rivalry. 100,000 words in, the author has discovered Rachel and Kelly are part of a conspiracy to bring down all teachers and rule the world. Mwa ha ha.

Thus, his plot has created his world-dominating, teacher destroying sisters.

Idea II: Develop characters first and your “true” plot will spring forth.

The author creates a folder on his computer for his new work. He organizes it to his liking. In one document, he creates a list of characters, whose names all begin with a different letter mind you, and their role: Antagonist, protagonist, ally, love interest, mentor, minion.

He then details the history of the teacher. He creates a protagonist who wants to teach and influence kids because of his own high school English teacher. He also wants to atone for a life he had in college which caused his college sweetheart to go down a dark road. He creates an antagonist, Kelly, who has been hurt by the males in her life and sees the teacher as someone who cares about her instead of just her body, but all she knows is to use sex as an weapon, bargaining tool, or gift of thanks.

Thus, he has fully formed characters who are driving massive conflicts and a plot which will hopefully keep the readers hooked to page 312. The idea and his original plot has changed from “A boring student-teacher affair defense” to “A teacher wants to atone for his sins by reforming the life of the high school harlot and ends up getting falsely accused.”

Am I an expert on plot and character? No. Have I learned about them and come far? Yes. Unfortunately, I am in a camp in a world full of camps: Liberals vs Conservatives, Democrats vs Republicans, Watermelon vs Sour Apple Jolly Ranchers.

What do I focus on after an idea has been birthed? Character. The more you know about your characters before writing will help to make deeper well rounded characters who brings out conflict. However, I am sure to get others who disagree. They may believe the only way to truly know a character is to write and have them show the author who they are. They may be right. I may be wrong, but there’s one thing we both agree on. After writing for several hours, bring us the blasted chicken and egg. We’re hungry!

Keep Writing. Keep Creating.

Tonight,  I was at my writer’s critique group, the Thursday night bunch. We had two visitors show up.  After everyone left, we stayed and talked about writing, the process and business. They asked me why should they join ours.  I told them the wonderful benefits of joining OWFI and such. I then told them one big reason.  “There are many good critique groups, but members in our group will tell you that you’re baby is ugly.”

We all have seen an ugly baby. Not wanting to disrespect the parents, we say “bless his heart” or “Wow! You have a…baby.” Never once do we say, “What the hell is that!” It’s rude and uncouth, yet we think it.

Many writer’s groups are the same way. A writer brings in a work to critique and many critiquers will not say “your baby is ugly.” These groups are dangerous to the writer. They coddle their feelings with “you’re missing a comma”, “great dialogue”, and the always beneficial “beautiful writing.” I have seen beautiful houses built upon horrendous foundations.

Then there are writer’s groups, like mine, which has members which will tell you “something is wrong with that hellspawn you produced.” (They’re not that harsh.) Thanks, to our wonderful current president and her insight into building the foundation before building the house, we are acknowledging “I did not give birth to a stripling cherub.”

A good writer’s group is one that pushes you to become a better writer, a lover of your craft. It pokes, prods, pushes, and prunes you. These things hurt, but the road to success is not easy. This type of group does not just hunt for every was and comma splice, but examines conflict, character, and crossing arcs.

The writer who attends this type of group must be willing to admit they are not presently the greatest author (but may be one day), my craft needs work, and I want to grow. This benefits the writer who gets 40,000 words in and finds out the characters have no goals, chapters have no conflict, and the inciting incident should have happened on page 3 instead of page 33.

The writer who believes in their heart of hearts their baby belongs in the Gerber pageant need not attend. This writer can’t stand the heat of true critique. The thought of their work not being the next big thing is unfathomable. God forbid, they have to scrap 100,000 words and rewrite or ditch the entire project because there is no conflict between a Green Beret who’s antagonist is a pimply faced band geek who believes he can stop the Green Beret in hand to hand combat.

Most babies are not ugly. However, there are some you want to feed with a slingshot. Many people write beautifully. Others need help whether they know it or not. Writers who join critique groups should not go to be coddled. They have friends and family for that. They should go to be challenged and pushed. The good critique group is like a refiner’s fire. They challenge without condemning. They burn out the dross to help produce a work that is publishable and something the reader wants to say “You got to read this!”

If you’re interested in more, check out Kristen Lamb’s, my wonderful critique president, blog “Critique- If You Can’t Stand the Heat, Get Out of the Kitchen” at  http://warriorwriters.wordpress.com/.

Keep Writing Keep Creating


Hello world!

So, this is my first blog. It’s kind of boring because I’m just learning and tweaking with everything. Can’t wait to start blogging.